Some of our foregoing considerations render credence towards the assertion one metaphor try an analogous label. It is substantiated by the St Thomas‘ techniques involved thirteen out of new Prima Pars , while the inside post about three, when he asks or no name is told you securely from Jesus, the fresh new resistance delivered into play are ranging from usage proprie and you may improprie into the second known that have metaphor. After that, in article half dozen, when he requires in the event the labels prominent to help you Jesus and animals is first told you off creatures, the change proprie/improprie is apparently a beneficial subdivision out-of analogous name. St Thomas starts by proclaiming that „in the omnibus nominibus quae de pluribus analogice dicuntur, necesse est quod omnia dicuntur for each respectum offer unum: mais aussi ideo illud unum oportet quod ponatur in the definitione omnium. Et quia ratio quam significat nomen for every single prius dicitur de- eo quod ponitur inside definitione aliorum, ainsi que for every single posterius de aliis, secundum ordinem quo appropinquant ad illud primum vel magis vel without.“ This is exemplified by old reliable, „suit.“ „Sic for this reason omni nomina quae metaphorice de Deo dicuntur each prius de creaturis dicuntur quam de- Deo: quia dicta de Deo, nihil aliud high quam similitudines ad reports creaturas.“ St. Thomas sees the latest similarity out-of ratio ( similitudo proportionum ) meant when you look at the „cheerful meadow“ as well as in calling God a good lion.
When he goes on to talk off almost every other names „quae low metaphorice dicuntur de Deo,“ brand new clear effect would be the fact he could be speaking off most other times away from analogous names than metaphors
Were there messages in which St Thomas opposes metaphor and analogy? When we look to the new feedback to your Metaphysics , we find St Thomas pinpointing „potency“ towards the analogous and you may equivocal modes. „Potency“ means a number of things. „Sed ista multiplicitas quantum ad quosdam analogiae.“ The brand new equivocal settings away from strength are exemplified by the way we discuss about it step three on 3rd stamina as well as the cube just like the energy of line. „Et propter hoc for each and every quamdam similitudinem dicitur potens inside quadratum, sicut dicitur materia potens within the rem“ Once again an effective proportionality find. Why these equivocal methods really are metaphors is obvious about parallel passing in book Delta from inside the leaving comments on which St Thomas begins, „Ostendit quomodo potentia sumatur metaphorice.“ Exactly why are such methods metaphorical rather than analogical? „His therefore modis praetermissis, considerandum est de potentiis, quae reducuntur post unam speciem, quia quaelibet earum est principium quoddam, ainsi que omnes potentiae sic dictae reducantur advertising aliquid principium ex quo omnes aliae dicuntur.“ Basically, St Thomas right here opposes metaphor to help you analogous uses regarding a name just like the second and not the previous include a reduction so you can what’s mainly denominated by term involved whereas, should they you desire mentioning, regarding the text message of one’s Summa we felt a moment before, the newest metaphor wasn’t known regarding the expansion proprie on this subject basis. Or is they the manner of your regard to what is principally signifed of the title hence differentiates metaphor off analogy, incorporate proprie from improprie ? Things called metaphorically write a research paper for me was, anyway, delivered to end up being just like exactly what the label properly signifies.
What we is going to be trying to find is some technique for justifying this new fairly common differences from metaphor and you may analogy such that no attention was created to Cajetan’s section away from example on attribution and right proportionality
An aporia features demonstrably emerged, thus, as well as solution are only able to feel got by deciding what a great metaphor are and you may exactly what a keen analogous name is. Approaches to these inquiries would be to allow me to comprehend the seem to contradictory comments from Aquinas.